Protecting the environment through smart solar choices

Author: Tree Hugger (Page 5 of 12)

Appalachian Power electricity rate increases on the way

Appalachian Power projects electricity rate increases of up to 55% by 2035, according to the Roanoke Times. Appalachian has filed a base rate hike request with Virginia’s State Corporation Commission (SCC) for the third year in a row. In 2021, the SCC approved a $16 monthly increase for the average residential customer in the 30 counties served by Appalachian Power.

Key points from the article include:

  • In 2020, the SCC denied a rate increase for $10, but Appalachian is appealing that ruling to the Virginia Supreme Court. The Court could overturn the SCC rejection and allow the rate increase.
  • Appalachian wants to raise average monthly residential bills by $2.37 over the next year. This will cover the $32M cost to buy a utility-scale solar project in Pittsylvania County outright. And it will help buy electricity from projects in Bedford, Louisa, and Rockingham Counties.
  • Appalachian asked the SCC to keep its cost projections for solar and wind projects sealed. These costs will drive future residential rate increases.
  • Virginia Assistant Attorney General Mitch Burton has asked the SCC to unseal that information. He believes customers and the public have a right to know the basic cost information for company projects.
  • The Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA) requires Appalachian to eliminate all carbon-based power sources by 2050. Coal accounts for 64.5% of Appalachian’s electric power supply and natural gas for 19.1%. Most of the rest comes from hydroelectric power. 
  • Appalachian has given six different options to the SCC that it says will let it meet its VCEA requirements. 

Read the full article here:

Appalachian Power plans for its renewable energy future, Roanoke Times, 24 Apr 2022, Laurence Hammack

Solar construction damaging Halifax County roads

Solar construction on the 80-MW Powell Creek solar project in Halifax County is damaging local roads, according to residents.

According to SOVANow, heavy truck traffic is leaving local roads with multiple large potholes. At a Board of Supervisors meeting on 4 April, a VDOT representative said his office had gotten a lot of complaints but that the “roads wasn’t built to handle that kind of traffic.”

If that’s true, why was the project approved without mitigation measures already in place to prevent the damage?

Continue reading

Surry County solar project rejected (again)

The Surry County planning commission has rejected the 150-MW Loblolly Solar project as being in conflict with the county’s comprehensive plan. The project would clear-cut 900 acres of forested land at the intersection of Routes 10 and 40 to install over 500,000 solar panels. The project has been in development by Hexagon Energy for well over two years.

Read more here:

Continue reading
« Older posts Newer posts »